Cases 11 - 20 of 27
MONT-JONES v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06683
Plaintiff:
MARILYN MONT-JONES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLAIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00737
Petitioner:
MONTE BLAIR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MONTES v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2016cv00653
Petitioner:
LUIS MONTES
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Munford v. Pitts et al
as 1:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
Markal Trey Munford, Sr.
Defendant:
Tiffamy Pitts, Vincent Monte and Doubleday
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLAIR v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2014cv01207
Plaintiff:
MONTE D. BLAIR
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CITY OF PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE, REGINA MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Lusick v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 13-3115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GEORGE LUSICK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JUDGE JACQUELINE ALLEN, JOSEPH H. EVERS, Prothonatary and others
James Runyon v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 12-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. RUNYON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of the Delaware Department of Corrections, PERRY PHELPS, DAVID PIERCE and others
Runyon v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
James R. Runyon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2010cv04357
Plaintiff:
JAMAL EUGENE BENNETT
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, CITY COMMISSIONERS (MONT. COUNTY), NANCY T. MCFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTS v. KAISER
as 2:2009cv05989
Plaintiff:
CARNIE MONTS
Defendant:
THOMAS KAISER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
