Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv05593
Plaintiff: AMOS BROWN, III
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SINGLETON v. ROBINSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02382
Plaintiff: AMOS JAMES SINGLETON
Defendant: ROBINSON, UNKNOWN OFFICER ON DUTY, WENDY SHAYLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amos Tate v. Director FBI, et al
as 13-4017
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMOS TATE
Defendant - Appellee: DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Tate v. Tyson et al
as 1:2013cv02202
Plaintiff: Amos Tate
Defendant: Tyson, Tammy Ferguson, William Frantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. LAMAS et al
as 1:2013cv00226
Petitioner: AMOS TATE
Respondent: LAMAS and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tate v. Lamas et al
as 1:2013cv01844
Petitioner: Amos Tate
Respondent: Lamas and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tate v. Muller et al
as 1:2013cv01762
Plaintiff: Amos Tate
Defendant: Muller, Tom Cobert, Wiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv07072
Petitioner: SHIHEEM AMOS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TATE v. ERIE DISTRICT ATTORNEY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00110
Petitioner: AMOS TATE
Respondent: ERIE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TATE v. OWNER PLYMOUTH TAVERN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00320
Plaintiff: AMOS TATE
Defendant: OWNER PLYMOUTH TAVERN, BARTENDER and INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?