Cases 11 - 20 of 46
DIBIASE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2021cv02679
Defendant:
OFFICER ROWE, WARDEN RICHARD T. SMITH, ASSISTANT WARDEN CHARLES WARREN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R. DIBIASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. WARDEN RICHARD SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv18863
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN CHARLES WARREN and WARDEN RICHARD SMITH
Plaintiff:
TODD FORD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. EBBERT et al
as 2:2020cv01736
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT and ASSISTANT WARDEN COLBERT
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
THOMPSON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv12454
Plaintiff:
JACOB THOMPSON
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN CHARLES WARREN and WARDEN RICHARD T. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv10363
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN CHARLES WARREN and WARDEN RICHARD T. SMITH
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDWIN v. OFFICER T. BROWN et al
as 1:2018cv16213
Defendant:
E. FLETCHER, OFFICER T. BROWN, LIEUTENANT TUCKER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN T. BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Perdue et al
as 3:2018cv01595
Defendant:
Unit Manager R. Scandel, Warden R. Perdue, Assistant Warden R. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simpson v. Warden FNU LNU et al
as 3:2017cv02081
Plaintiff:
David Simpson
Defendant:
Warden FNU LNU, Assistant Warden Operations FNU LNU, Assistant Warden Custody FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim Millbrook v. USA, et al
as 17-2138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIM LEE MILLBROOK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, LT. FOSROT, S.I.S. and others
David Gambino v. Bobby Meeks, et al
as 17-1813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY L. MEEKS, H. BARRON, ASSISTANT WARDEN, VAN HORN, HEALTH ADMINISTRATOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
