Cases 11 - 20 of 140
Pascal Gedeon v. Attorney General, et al
as 22-3450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PASCAL GEDEON
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
MAPLE v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
ERIC MAPLE
Defendant:
LARRY KRASNER, LAWRENCE J GOODE, COLE STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Warden of FPC-Lewisburg
as 1:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
Michael Cole
Respondent:
Warden of FPC-Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARRIS v. COLE et al
as 5:2022cv05147
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARRIS
Defendant:
AMY COLE, MOSES MARTINEZ, ERIC S. PENNYPACKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Michael Cole
as 22-3452
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL COLE
Cole v. Vernet et al
as 1:2022cv01487
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cole
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Miles Vernet, Correctional Officer Jeremiah Purnell, Correctional Officer Bowder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv01662
Petitioner:
Michael Cole
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WEEKLEY v. SGT. PROVIDENT et al
as 1:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
MONROE WEEKLEY, III
Defendant:
SGT. PROVIDENT, OFFICER COLE, OFFICER DRAYER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
COLE v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2022cv05557
Petitioner:
JAMAINE L. COLE
Respondent:
PATRICK A. NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES, II v. EVANS et al
as 2:2022cv01744
Petitioner:
ANTHONY W. JONES, II
Defendant:
MR. EVANS, MS. NELSON, ATTORNEY GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
