Cases 11 - 20 of 26
DENNIS v. SMITH et al
as 3:2020cv00017
Defendant:
MAJOR J.R. BARROWS, SERGEANT NYMAN, D. VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GHOLSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00175
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, PEACE, PAMELA S. OLIVER and others
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MILLER v. DRISCOLL et al
as 3:2019cv00143
Defendant:
JOEL BARROWS, DAVID CLOSE, SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMTIH and others
Plaintiff:
ARNELL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FENNELL v. PIROZZOLA et al
as 3:2019cv00097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FENNELL
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, LONNIE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BULLARD et al v. SMEAL et al
as 2:2019cv01186
Defendant:
SHELIA MOORE SMEAL, DAVID CLOSE, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOY BULLARD and ABDUL IDEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
PEGGY BARNS, DAVID CLOSE, REBECCA REIFER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02280
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffery A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2015cv01959
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Robert Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hector Borrero v. Steven Glunt, et al
as 13-1530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR BORRERO
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN GLUNT, SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE, DAVID CLOSE, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE, DAVID KESSLING, FORMER DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT CENTRALIZED SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
