Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Pew v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00668
Defendant:
Shawn P Kenny, Dorina Varner, Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Renee Shrimp, 10 A/POC CO's, Jane/John Doe(s) Psychologists and others
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2019cv05954
Respondent:
NIKKI CAMPBELL, BUREAU OF PRISONS, JONATHAN HENSHAW and others
Petitioner:
ELWOOD THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darien Houser v. Wetzel, et al
as 19-1889
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICA SERVICE GROUP INC, Corizon, DR. PARKS, MANUFACTURE OF RUGBY ANTI DANDRUFF SHAMPOO RUGBY LABORATORIES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIEN HOUSER
Bundy v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Doctor Jaques LeClerc, Diamond Pharmacy, Judith Rowe and others
Plaintiff:
Zakiyyia Bundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. DIAMOND et al
as 2:2018cv03067
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
PAUL S. DIAMOND and KATE BARKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAUSO v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2017cv04721
Plaintiff:
GENNARO RAUSO
Defendant:
ANGELA MARTINEZ, DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT FOR THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, MARY MCFALL HOPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBLES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08248
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND LATINA ROBLES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARING v. GOURMET DIAMOND, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv08191
Plaintiff:
LEHJYE WARING
Defendant:
GOURMET DIAMOND, INC. and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSER v. WIDENOUR et al
as 2:2016cv01039
Defendant:
WETZEL, DR. JIN, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
HOUSER and DARIEN HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
