Cases 11 - 20 of 65
DONAHUE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv02750
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. DONAHUE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID OWENS and KATE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Dippolito v. USA, et al
as 17-1048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK DIPPOLITO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General in his Capacity as Administrrtor of the Second Chance Act, HARLEY LAPPIN, Fomer FBOP Director in his Capacity as FBOP Director and others
Debtor - Appellee:
YEOMAN, Tool Room Officer in his Capacity as FCI Officer
DONAHUE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06413
Plaintiff:
JEREMY T. DONAHUE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donahue Dewar v. Warden Loretto FCI
as 16-1259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONAHUE DEWAR
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LORETTO FCI
DEWAR v. MILLION
as 3:2016cv00002
Petitioner:
DONAHUE DEWAR
Respondent:
SHAWN MILLION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MUCCI v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER DARBY et al
as 2:2014cv05215
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI MUCCI
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UPPER DARBY, MICHAEL TAYLOR, STEPHEN ORSKOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Joseph Donahue
as 14-3161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH P. DONAHUE
Donahue v. USA
as 3:2013cv02464
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joseph P. Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robert Oleson v. Spalding, et al
as 13-3484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT R. OLESON
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. SPALDING, MS. BROWN, MR. DONAHUE and others
Defendant:
MR. HEFFRON, SANTOS, PORCARRO and others
Karim Faruq v. Mary McCollum, et al
as 13-3229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARIM FARUQ
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY MCCOLLUM, Case Manager, F.C.I. Fort Dix, DAVID SCHAAFF, Unit Manager, F.C.I. Fort Dix and ROBERT DONAHUE, CMC, F.C.I. Fort Dix
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
