Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Powell v. Black et al
as 2:2021cv05214
Petitioner:
Breon Powell
Respondent:
WARDEN DUANE BLACK, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and BUCKS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BATTLE v. KAIL et al
as 2:2021cv01682
Plaintiff:
ISSA BATTLE
Defendant:
MARTIN D. KAIL, JOSEPH NOVAKOWSKI, DAVID LINCOLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Powell v. Black et al
as 4:2021cv01642
Petitioner:
Breon Powell
Respondent:
Duane Black, Josh Shapiro and PA Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2021cv17348
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv01004
Petitioner:
DUANE BROCK THOMAS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CLARK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEAN v. MASOTTO et al
as 2:2021cv00969
Plaintiff:
STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES MASOTTO, MATT DARR and JOSEPH SIEBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. LT. NAPOLEAN et al
as 2:2021cv00971
Plaintiff:
STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant:
LT. NAPOLEAN, SGT. ZHAURUNG, C/O KARPENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. BUZAS et al
as 2:2021cv00968
Plaintiff:
STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant:
AL STEVEN BUZAS, KAREN SOKOL, JOSEPH SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. KUZMA et al
as 2:2021cv00972
Plaintiff:
STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant:
CO KUZMA, CO ANKROM and CO DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. ADAMSON et al
as 2:2021cv00966
Plaintiff:
STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER R. ADAMSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KUZMA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ANKROM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
