Cases 11 - 20 of 114
NUNEZ BRAVO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv05190
Plaintiff:
LISSETTE NUNEZ BRAVO
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH INC., MHM CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC doing business as MHM SERVICES INC. AND PARENT COMPANY CENTURION HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Robert Floyd
as 22-3080
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT LEANDER FLOYD, a/k/a Doc
JACKSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03527
Plaintiff:
DANTE JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH INC., CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LISA CRESPO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Mermigos
as 1:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Defendant:
Theodore G. Mermigos, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOYD v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2022cv01229
Plaintiff:
AIKIAM FLOYD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bogle v. Zaken et al
as 2:2022cv00240
Petitioner:
Floyd C. Bogle
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bogle v. Zaken et al
as 3:2022cv00071
Petitioner:
Floyd C. Bogle
Respondent:
Michael Zaken and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEANS v. FLOYD
as 1:2021cv00362
Plaintiff:
DARRIAN DEANS
Defendant:
AUGUSTUS FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BULLARD v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv05158
Plaintiff:
JAMES BULLARD
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL, DEPUTY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUL-JABBAR et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv02077
Plaintiff:
SHATISHA ABDUL-JABBAR, AL-AMIN ABDUL-JABBAR, SHARON BELL and others
Defendant:
OFFICER NATHAN LONDON, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
