Cases 11 - 20 of 54
ALEXANDER v. BEARD et al
as 1:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, MICHAEL TKACS, HOOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOPER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03706
Petitioner:
BRIAN HOOPER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and LOUIS FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GILBERT v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2012cv07611
Plaintiff:
GUYLYN GILBERT
Defendant:
AFFIYYAH ROBERTS, CLANCY, HOOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. CRAYTON et al
as 2:2012cv01533
Plaintiff:
EDWARD F JENKINS
Defendant:
CRAYTON, ROLL, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Crayton et al
as 3:2012cv02006
Plaintiff:
Edward F Jenkins
Defendant:
Crayton, Roll, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rasheen Nifas v. Brian Coleman, et al
as 12-1705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RASHEEN NIFAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, T. BERRIER, W. LEGGETT and others
Not Party - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
BARKLEY
Lucas v. Bledsoe et al
as 1:2011cv02318
Plaintiff:
James A. Lucas
Defendant:
B.A. Bledsoe, E. Stuart and T. Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IVERSON v. BARNACLE et al
as 2:2011cv01108
Plaintiff:
DAVID IVERSON
Defendant:
JAMES C. BARNACLE, CINDY G. WATSON, BRIAN V. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iverson v. Barnacle et al
as 3:2011cv01483
Plaintiff:
David Iverson
Defendant:
James C. Barnacle, Cindy G. Watson, Brian V. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Williams v. John Clancy, et al
as 11-2384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN CLANCY, Administrator, SHELIA LEONARDO, Administrator, KEITH HOOPER, Supervisor of Operations and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
