Cases 11 - 20 of 1,219
Hunt v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hunt
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMISIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, DEPUTY WARDEN HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. COOPER et al
as 2:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND C. BROWN
Defendant:
LAKEISHA COOPER, MARCOS ORTIZ, MICHAEL SHILLINGFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IVANCICH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv04229
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID IVANCICH and MICHAEL D. IVANCICH
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JUSTIN PINTO, AHMED JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
CHARLES D. JONES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, NICOLE W. ZICCARELLI, STEVEN PELESKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
YOUNG v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
BRYANT YOUNG
Defendant:
SECRETARY DR. LAUREL HARRY, SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, DEPUTY SECRETARY T. FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden of SCI-Mahanoy et al
as 1:2024cv00391
Petitioner:
Wallace Jones
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Mahanoy and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Tolbert v. Mandy Sipple, et al
as 24-1346
Plaintiff:
KEITH C. TOLBERT
Defendant:
MANDY SIPPLE, ANN LEWIS, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Marcellus Jones v. Robert Gilmore, et al
as 24-1307
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, DENISE SMITH, JAMES BRESHAHN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
