Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Ojo v. Decker et al
as 2:2020cv05538
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Paul Borke, Thomas Michael Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettis v. Everhart et al
as 3:2019cv01308
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Everhart, Correctional Officer Wykoff, Security Lt. Vance and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Pettis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Evans et al
as 1:2019cv00445
Defendant:
Warden Carole Evans and Ms. Mosley
Plaintiff:
Julian Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETTY v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv00025
Defendant:
ERIC TICE, TED JOHNSON and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
JASON PETTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PETTIS v. BONDS et al
as 3:2018cv11626
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Petitioner:
JASON PETTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PETTIES v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 3:2018cv05723
Plaintiff:
RONALD PETTIES
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, VANESSA CRAVEIRO, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE STATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETTIES et al v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2017cv12965
Plaintiff:
RONALD PETTIES and DOMINIQUE SELLERS
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, VANESSA CRAVEIRO, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Petty v. Superintendent Chester SCI, et al
as 17-2151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY L. PETTY
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CHESTER SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
PETTY v. JONES et al
as 1:2017cv02967
Plaintiff:
JULIAN PETTY
Defendant:
JOHN JONES, TYEFA WORTHY, PRATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 16-4135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN E. WETZEL, DANIEL BURNS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
MARGARET GORDAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
