Cases 11 - 20 of 69
GIORDANO v. OCEAN COUNTY et al
as 3:2021cv20482
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIORDANO
Defendant:
OCEAN COUNTY, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Jamison
as 1:2021cv01409
Petitioner:
Virgil Rivers
Respondent:
J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ACKERMAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 1:2021cv00091
Petitioner:
JONATHAN E. ACKERMAN and JONATHAN JASON BARTOSEK
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPT. OF MONROE CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX-TWIN RIVERS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WARREN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GIORDANO v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER et al
as 3:2020cv18432
Defendant:
J. EVERETT, R. RAHNER, A. PACIULLI and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIORDANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers Bey v. Howard
as 1:2020cv01576
Respondent:
Warden C. Howard
Petitioner:
Virgil Rivers Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Novasel et al
as 1:2020cv01545
Plaintiff:
Marvin "Running Rivers" Banks and Marvin Banks
Defendant:
Sgt. Novasel and C.O. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD et al v. PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 2:2020cv00931
Respondent:
TOM WOLF, ORLANDO HARPER, PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE and others
Petitioner:
River Silverelk, Laura Michelle Schlemmer, FREDERICK BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RIVERS v. FRAVEL et al
as 2:2020cv00071
Plaintiff:
RASHEEN RIVERS
Defendant:
NATALIE FRAVEL, CURLEY, PA STATE PROBATION AND PAROLE RECORDS DEPARTMENT STAFF AGENT CULEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERS v. REILLY et al
as 2:2020cv00076
Plaintiff:
RASHEEN RIVERS
Defendant:
THE GEO GROUP INC. MEDICAL DEPARTMENT COMPASS, WARDEN LEE TATUM, JOHN A. REILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERS v. GALLOWAY
as 2:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
RASHEEN RIVERS
Defendant:
SCOTT D. GALLOWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
