Cases 11 - 20 of 27
SHAY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv01388
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, WARDEN GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
KEVIN R. SHAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHAY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv00213
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, WARDEN GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNYSLVANIA
Petitioner:
KEVIN R. SHAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Demetrius Bailey v. Renee Foulds, et al
as 17-2844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
RENEE FOULDS, BRAD RITCHEY, HOPWOOD, CO and others
Jason Kokinda v. Pennsylvania Department Of Cor, et al
as 17-1960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant - Appellee:
CORREALE STEVENS, Personal Capacity, JAMES J. FITZGERALD, III, Personal Capacity, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
MASSEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06036
Plaintiff:
SHAY MASSEY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2015cv00671
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SHAY
Defendant:
GILMORE, D'ALASANDRO, ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Spears v. Curcillo et al
as 1:2013cv03053
Plaintiff:
Andthony Ray Spears
Defendant:
Joseph A. Curcillo, III, Frank J. Lavery, Jr., Jeffery T. Haste and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. Spence et al
as 3:2013cv00612
Plaintiff:
John Boyd Morrow
Defendant:
Spence, Franklin County Jail, K Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. State Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2012cv02207
Plaintiff:
Julio Cruz Vargas
Defendant:
State Department of Corrections, David A. Varano, Danny Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASSEY v. TAYLOR
as 1:2011cv05437
Plaintiff:
SHAY MASSEY
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
