Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Stevenson v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2021cv01611
Plaintiff:
Joel R. Stevenson
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Officer Beckels, Wendy Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENSON v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2021cv18970
Plaintiff:
MARLIN STEVENSON
Defendant:
CARL JACKSON, AUGUSTINO and MR. STANFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'DONNELL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04126
Plaintiff:
KELLY O'DONNELL, ANGELA BONNANO-RICHTER and KELLEY O'DONNELL
Defendant:
DANIEL R. STEVENSON, THURGOOD MATTHEWS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENSON v. BRITO et al
as 2:2021cv02837
Defendant:
OFFICER Y. BRITO and JOHN DOE 1-5
Plaintiff:
MARKQUETT STEVENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. USA
as 3:2021cv00146
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terrell Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent:
Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coates JR. v. Faulkner et al
as 1:2020cv00772
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Coates JR.
Defendant:
Robert Heishman, Robert May, Lt. Justin Atherholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv04921
Defendant:
ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK, EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER MONTGOMERY, SHERRI JONES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. Members of the Gender Dysphoria Consultation Group et al
as 1:2019cv01518
Defendant:
Sergeant Angelina DeAllie, Deputy Warden Philip Parker, Sergeant "John" Abernathy and others
Plaintiff:
Kamilla London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
