Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03726
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
COFIELD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv02637
Petitioner:
KEENAN K. COFIELD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , ERIC HOLDER , FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jeremy Davis v. Christine Beer
as 10-3016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY JOSEPH DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE BEERS, STEPHEN E. EGBERT, Special Agent of Federal Bureau of Investigation, WILLIAM J. EDGE, JR., Special Agent of Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Diaz v. Harrisburg Hospital (Pinnacle Health) et al
as 3:2010cv00783
Plaintiff:
Nelson Diaz
Defendant:
Harrisburg Hospital, Dauphin County Jail and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz v. Harrisburg Hospital et al
as 3:2010cv00400
Plaintiff:
Nelson Diaz
Defendant:
Harrisburg Hospital, Dauphin County Jail and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BRONSON v. U.S. MARSHAL et al
as 2:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
PURCELL BRONSON
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL and U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE HEADQUARTERS et al
as 2:2009cv00349
Plaintiff:
RODERICK F. BAILEY
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE HEADQUARTERS and RUSTIC
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ROBINSON v. U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2008cv03186
Plaintiff:
SHERROD ROBINSON
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, COOPER MEDICAL CENTER, TROY LEVI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
