Cases 21 - 30 of 85,363
Greg DeYoung v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 24-2049
Plaintiff:
GREG DEYOUNG
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Shawn Williams v. Jaime Sorber, et al
as 24-2046
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER, Former Superintendent of SCI Phoenix, JOHN E. WETZEL, Former Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and GEORGE M. LITTLE, Former Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
PAGE v. PRIORE et al
as 2:2024cv02462
Plaintiff:
KYLE PAGE
Defendant:
CHIEF PATRICK PRIORE, BRIAN VITKO, HOME DEPOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENSLEY v. SWANSON
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HENSLEY
Defendant:
ALICIA SWANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ODEN v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
KALEIB ODEN
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON, SGT BLACK, CO BREMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Delaware Department of Correction et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
William Jack Edwards
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Correction and VitalCore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FATA
as 5:2024cv02402
Not Yet Classified:
ABRAHIM FATA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. CO 1 DUNSTON et al
as 2:2024cv02424
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TAYLOR
Defendant:
CO 1 DUNSTON and THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ricard
as 3:2024cv00921
Petitioner:
Mark Brown
Respondent:
Warden Ricard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00922
Petitioner:
Joseph Gill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
