Cases 21 - 30 of 115
BROWN v. THE HOUSE OF CORRECTION(S) PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2018cv03397
Plaintiff:
REGINALD BROWN
Defendant:
THE HOUSE OF CORRECTION(S) PHILADELPHIA, MARVIN PORTER, WILLIAM LAWTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY et al v. O'MALLEY et al
as 2:2017cv01599
Plaintiff:
CALISIA KELLEY and JOHNNIE MAE KELLEY
Defendant:
BRIAN O'MALLEY, DOMINIC RIVOTTI, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. REILEY et al
as 2:2017cv04034
Plaintiff:
DAVID MURPHY, JOHN BELLEGUE, JEROME BERRY and others
Defendant:
REILEY, A. SZEKELY, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. SALEM COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2017cv05252
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant:
SALEM COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, J. PORTER, E. WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orin Turner v. Linda Tezac, et al
as 17-2403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORIN TURNER
Defendant:
LINDA TEZAC and PORTER, classification officer
PORTER v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00763
Plaintiff:
ERNEST PORTER
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. JOHNSON
as 2:2017cv02796
Petitioner:
OSCAR PORTER
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PORTER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00025
Petitioner:
SHURON PORTER
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, THOMAS F. MERRICK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PORTER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06424
Plaintiff:
ELWOOD PORTER, IV
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTER v. GREEN
as 2:2016cv05936
Petitioner:
TROY PORTER
Respondent:
CHARLES GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
