Cases 21 - 30 of 30
HARRIS v. EBBERT et al
as 4:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Harris
Defendant:
David J. Ebbert, Robert Coffey and Joseph Beadle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. EBBERT et al
as 2:2009cv05938
Plaintiff:
AHMAD HARRIS
Defendant:
DAVID J. EBBERT, ROBERT COFFEY and JOSEPH BEADLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ahmad Waller v. Bruce Hauck
as 09-2784
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AHMAD WALLER
Defendant:
BRUCE HAUCK and ANNE MILGRAM
Ahmad v. Martinez
as 1:2009cv01071
Petitioner:
Ibrahim Ahmad
Respondent:
Jerry C. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Akhil Bansal v. Eric Russ, et al
as 08-2942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKHIL BANSAL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLOS AQUINO, ATTY GEN USA, DAVE BOLE and others
Defendant:
STEVE HORNESS, RONALD KHAN, TUSHAR VAISHNAV and others
WALLER v. HAUCK et al
as 2:2008cv02716
Petitioner:
AHMAD WALLER
Respondent:
BRUCE HAUCK and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MALARIK v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2008cv00740
Petitioner:
JAMES M. MALARIK
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY, BEAVER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, AHMAD AZIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ahmad v. Contracted Health Services et al
as 1:2007cv00433
Plaintiff:
Shakir Taqi Ahmad
Defendant:
Contracted Health Services and Ionna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALEER v. SHERRER et al
as 2:2007cv01607
Petitioner:
AHMAD WALLER
Respondent:
LLYDELL SHERRER and STUART RABNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALARIK v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2007cv00392
Petitioner:
JAMES M. MALARIK
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY, AHMAD AZIZ, TOM CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
