Cases 21 - 30 of 257
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVENOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DIMAIO
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv02217
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, Robert Muir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv07888
Plaintiff:
TYRON MORTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chestnut v. Drew
as 3:2015cv01524
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Chestnut
Respondent:
Darlene Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
DREW v. WETZEL
as 2:2015cv02725
Petitioner:
THOMAS DREW
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLEMAN v. MCGARVIE et al
as 1:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
DREW COLEMAN
Defendant:
NANCIE R. FLYNN MCGARVIE and BEVERLY SUMMERS OROURKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODKEY v. NEWMAN et al
as 2:2015cv00476
Plaintiff:
DREW A. RODKEY
Defendant:
SGT. NEWMAN and OFFICER CASTELLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEELE v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2014cv07420
Plaintiff:
YUSEF STEELE
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE, P/O LEMMERING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEELE v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2014cv07418
Plaintiff:
YUSEF STEELE
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., NEW BRUNSWICK MUNICIPAL COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
