Cases 21 - 30 of 33
FOLEY v. CHRYSLER et al
as 2:2013cv01679
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY P. FOLEY
Defendant:
J. CHRYSLER, JR., ESCALERIA, JOSE MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASKINS v. HASTINGS, MS. et al
as 2:2012cv07274
Plaintiff:
DAVID GASKINS
Defendant:
BEVERLY HASTINGS, MS., SHERRY YATES, MS., WILLIAM ANDERSON, MR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPURGEON v. THE NJ STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2012cv03352
Plaintiff:
DAVID SPURGEON
Defendant:
THE NJ STATE POLICE, THE KEARNY NJ POLICE, THE JERSEY CITY POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv00116
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MAURICE F. FOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Foley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2012cv00538
Petitioner:
Maurice Foley
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
EARL SMITH
Defendant:
PAUL K. LAGANA , T. DIGGS and FOLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Maurice Foley
as 11-3849
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE F. FOLEY, AKA Maurice Hoover, AKA Clarence Lee Oday, II, AKA Luke
Foley v. Martinez
as 3:2010cv01984
Petitioner:
Ronald Foley
Respondent:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jonathan Riches v. Larry Craig, et al
as 08-4045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
LARRY CRAIG, Senator, MARK FOLEY, Representative, DAVID VITTER, Senator and others
FOLEY v. AHSON et al
as 1:2008cv02697
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FOLEY
Defendant:
AHSON and JOHN & JANE DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
