Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Kwasi Muhammad v. NJ Dept Corr, et al, et al
as 10-2152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KWASI SEKOU MUHAMMAD, AKA Michael Winstead
Defendant - Appellee:
NJ DEPT CORR, KIDWELL, A. SEXTON and others
Troy Williams v. USA
as 10-1653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY M. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00570
Petitioner:
David M. Williams
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv01744
Petitioner:
TROY M. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kwasi Muhammad v. NJ Dept Corr, et al
as 09-1819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KWASI SEKOU MUHAMMAD, AKA Michael Winstead
Defendant - Appellee:
NJ DEPT CORR, KIDWELL, A. SEXTON and others
Steven McDowell v. Lydell Sheerer, et al
as 08-4435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN MCDOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LYDELL SHEERER, C. SEARS, C. WALLACE and others
David M. Williams v. Dept of Corr, et al
as 08-3664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DEPT OF CORR and CORR MED SYS
Williams v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv00367
Plaintiff:
David M. Williams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Correctional Medical Systems
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2007cv01117
Petitioner:
LARRY M. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SCHUYLKILL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOLEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2007cv00014
Petitioner:
ROMEO COOLEY
Respondent:
DENEEN M. WILLIAMS, GERALDINE SPAIN and ERIE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
