Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Larry McDaniel v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 15-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
MCDANIELS v. USA
as 2:2014cv01708
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
WESLEY A. MCDANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MCDANIEL v. SCI ALBION
as 1:2014cv00238
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MCDANIEL
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, WILLIAM HIGGINS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Audrey McDaniels v. Warden Cambridge Springs SCI, et al
as 14-3485
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AUDREY MCDANIELS
Defendant - Appellant:
WARDEN CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
MCDANIELS v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv03942
Petitioner:
TYRONE MCDANIELS
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00801
Plaintiff:
MCDANIEL WALKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubert Jackson v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 13-4720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HUBERT JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, GERALD BIGLEY and others
Smith v. Thirty-Nine Employees of the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2013cv01848
Plaintiff:
Albert J. Smith
Defendant:
Thirty-Nine Employees of the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Rispoli, Enders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDANIEL v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
as 1:2013cv06583
Plaintiff:
TERENCE MCDANIEL
Defendant:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, JOSEPH HAWTIN and WILKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv01301
Plaintiff:
HUBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GERALD L. ROZUM, GERALD M. BIGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
