Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
WILLIAMS v. GILMORE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00238
Petitioner: MARK L. WILLIAMS
Respondent: ROBERT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00251
Plaintiff: MARK-ALONZO WILLIAMS
Defendant: MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, JOHN W. SAWTELLE, DEREK F. OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark-Alonzo Williams v. Wetzel, et al
as 17-2816
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK-ALONZO WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary
Cain, et al v. Oddo, et al
as 3:2017cv01081
Plaintiff: Raymond Cain, Richard Hugly and Mark Anthony Williams
Defendant: L.J. Oddo, Heath, Feltman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff: Mark-Alonzo Williams
Defendant: John Wetzel, Michael Klopotoski, Michael Mahally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02479
Petitioner: Mark-Alonzo Williams
Respondent: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00300
Plaintiff: MARK-ALONZO WILLIAMS
Defendant: JOHN WETZEL, MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, MICHAEL MAHALLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. ARMEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01233
Plaintiff: MARK-ALONZO WILLIAMS
Defendant: ERIC ARMEL, KEITH GRAFT, PETER SAAVEDRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?