Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Timothy Kreamer v. Mooney, et al
as 12-1440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY MAYNARD KREAMER
Defendant - Appellee:
MOONEY, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PA PROBATION DEPARTMENT and others
Jamison v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00124
Plaintiff:
Clarence Jamison
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, SVOP Probation Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRAFT v. UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2008cv01426
Petitioner:
RICHARD KRAFT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DILL v. CAMBRIA COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2008cv00175
Plaintiff:
BARRY E. DILL
Defendant:
CAMBRIA COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, CAMBRIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CAMBRIA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCDANIEL v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2008cv01006
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL MCDANIEL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCDANIEL v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2008cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL MCDANIEL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Deubel v. Franklin County Adult Parole and Probation Department et al
as 1:2008cv00261
Plaintiff:
Darrell William Deubel
Defendant:
Franklin County Adult Parole and Probation Department, Brook Alleman and Ed Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Lapin et al
as 3:2008cv00256
Petitioner:
Carlos Bishop
Respondent:
Warden Lapin, U.S. Probation Department and Unknown Contract Agencies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
