Cases 21 - 30 of 1,652
VILLAGRAN v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06523
Plaintiff:
JEREMY VILLAGRAN
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCULLEN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCULLEN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, SECRETARY DR. HARRY LAUREL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT KLEINFELTER and MICHELLE IVICIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPARD v. JOHN AND JANE DOES et al
as 2:2024cv05823
Plaintiff:
MACK CHARLES SHEPARD
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, UNION CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, HUDSON CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrone Singleton v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 24-1428
Plaintiff:
TYRONE SINGLETON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT WHALEN and LISA PETERS
ROBERTS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv05846
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH LLC and HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. KLINEFELTER
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03122
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, CASTRO and WELLPATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURGOS RESTO v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
