Cases 21 - 30 of 226
SANCHEZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv02609
Petitioner:
EPIFANIO SANCHEZ SANCHEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRANDT v. HUDSON COUNTY, THOMAS DEGISE et al
as 2:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY, THOMAS DEGISE, ERICA GALE, RYANNA BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedano-Sanchez v. Thompson
as 1:2023cv00548
Petitioner:
Omar Bonifacio Cedano-Sanchez
Respondent:
LSCI-Allenwood Warden R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANCHEZ v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv01111
Petitioner:
JEREMIAS SANCHEZ
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANCHEZ v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv01311
Petitioner:
CESAR SANCHEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PALOMO et al v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
MARIO PALOMO, MICHAEL CAMMARATA, JUAN C. CASTILLO-PONCE and others
Defendant:
GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE - UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE and JOHN DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. AVILES
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
DANILO SANCHEZ
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramon Sanchez v. Silbaugh, et al
as 22-3421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON SANCHEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN SILBAUGH, LIEUTENANT LEWIS, STEVEN LONGSTRETH and others
SANCHEZ v. LITTLE
as 2:2022cv01682
Plaintiff:
ORACIO SANCHEZ, JR
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Oracio Sanchez, Jr. v. Ulli Klemm, et al
as 22-3171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORACIO SANCHEZ, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ULLI KLEMM and TRACY SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
