Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Lawrence Tennille v. Francisco Quintana, et al
as 11-2682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE KEMP TENNILLE
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, RODNEY SMITH, S.L. NOLAN and others
HALE v. BICKEL et al
as 2:2011cv03153
Petitioner:
MARSHALL HALE
Respondent:
TABB BICKEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall Hale v. PA Bd Probation and Parole, et al
as 11-1430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
PA BD PROBATION AND PAROLE and ATTY GEN PA
WATLEY v. ROBERTSON et al
as 2:2010cv03726
Plaintiff:
LOUIS WATLEY
Defendant:
NORMAN ROBERTSON, CHARLES JONES, REBECCA MANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Hale, et al v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-2337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY A. HALE
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOMINGO COLON MONTANEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, INMATE ACCOUNTING, F. J. TENNIS and others
MCINTOSH v. GLEN et al
as 1:2009cv00295
Plaintiff:
CHARLES T. MCINTOSH
Defendant:
GLEN, RODNEY SMITH, DERRICK MEBANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSADO v. DOE et al
as 1:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
JERONIMO ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JON DOE, ROGER S. VIRGIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Hale v. McMillen, et al
as 09-2737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY A. HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
MCMILLEN, LYNN EATON, VANCE and others
Hale v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 4:2009cv01055
Petitioner:
Marshall Hale
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Hale v. Franklin Tennis, et al
as 09-2519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY A. HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN TENNIS, DA GREENE CTY and ATTY GEN PA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
