Cases 31 - 40 of 1,809
MCCUNE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W MCCUNE and THOMAS W. MCCUNE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, Superintendent R. IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BULLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
LAQUAN E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
K. BULLOCK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kenneth Cherry, Jr.
as 24-1213
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KENNETH EUGENE CHERRY, JR., a/k/a Kenny
BLOOM v. AMMERMAN, et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
CARL BLOOM
Defendant:
JUDGE FREDRIC J. AMMERMAN, PROTHONOTARY BRIAN K. SPENCER, CLEARFIELD PROBATION DEP. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. DePiero et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lamar Benton
Defendant:
F. DePiero, J. Rawlings, P. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Richard Corbin
as 24-1146
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RICHARD CORBIN, a/k/a Rasheed, a/k/a Sheed, a/k/a Richard Rasheed Corbin
HARRISON v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
JIHAAD HARRISON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PATRICIA THOMPSON, KURT SUESSER, PAUL BROCKLEHURST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HIGGS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv23402
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. HIGGS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., M. CHERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Dorsey, II v. Rebecca Peters, et al
as 23-3216
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. DORSEY, II
Defendant:
LPN REBECCA PETERS, CASE MANAGER A. FOURA-WHITE, NURSE K. WILLIAMS and others
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
