Cases 31 - 40 of 68
KING v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv02425
Plaintiff:
DEONDRAE L. KING
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ACTING WARDEN EUGENE CALDWELL, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Folk v. Gibson
as 3:2022cv00591
Petitioner:
Omar Folk
Respondent:
Acting Warden P. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WHITE v. CARROLL
as 1:2022cv01634
Petitioner:
EDWARD WHITE
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN MICHAEL W. CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Burke, Randy v. Prosper, Diane Prosper
as 1:2020cv00021
Plaintiff:
Randy Burke
Defendant:
Acting Warden Diane Prosper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scruggs v. Rush et al
as 1:2019cv02217
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Stephen Rush, Acting Warden Philip Parker, Captain Denise Massey and others
Plaintiff:
Lammot Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 3:2019cv17704
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY, ROGER BREMEKAMP, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELO TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOBSON v. ACTING WARDEN OF THE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MCKEAN-RESPONDENT-THE PERSON HAVING CUSTODY OF THE COMPLAINANT
as 1:2019cv00016
Petitioner:
KASEEN DOBSON
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN OF THE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MCKEAN-RESPONDENT-THE PERSON HAVING CUSTODY OF THE COMPLAINANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALFORD v. ACTING WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2019cv00010
Petitioner:
ERIC ALFORD
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
