Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Kevin Beattie v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 14-3931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN BEATTIE
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
BEATTY v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv02676
Plaintiff:
RONALD LAMAR BEATTY, SR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le Blanc v. Bickell et al
as 4:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Donnelly J Le Blanc
Defendant:
Tabb Bickell, J Hills, Younkers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Butler et al
as 1:2013cv02106
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
D. Butler, L. Hunt, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BEATTIE v. BICKEL et al
as 2:2013cv03961
Petitioner:
KEVIN BEATTIE
Respondent:
TABB BICKEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEATTY v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2013cv03089
Plaintiff:
STEFON BEATTY
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, ADM. C RAY HUGHES, OFFICER REEVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercaldo v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv01139
Plaintiff:
Richard Mercaldo
Defendant:
J. Wetzel, J. Barnacle, J. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYO v. BEATTY et al
as 1:2012cv00164
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Defendant:
DOUG BEATTY, MCGARVIE, RHONDA SHERBINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOMACK v. WARREN et al
as 3:2012cv01232
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. WOMACK
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON, T. BEATTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Salter v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 12-1286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD R. SALTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, Superintendent, JEFFREY RACKOVAN, BEATTY, Prinncipal and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
