Cases 31 - 40 of 503
BANKS v. USA
as 2:2022cv00975
Petitioner:
MONTA BANKS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Frederick Banks v. US Probation Officer Western District of Pennsylva, et al
as 22-2093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US SENATOR BOB DOLE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1837
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Antonio Saunders v. BB&T Bank, et al
as 22-1797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO SAUNDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
BB&T BANK, formerly known as BRANCH BANKING & TRUST, DETECTIVE MICHAEL MUNCH and DETECTIVE GARY HAMMER
Defendant:
JAMIE ADAMS, BB&T BANK, GARY HAMMER and others
CARROLL, JR. v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv01720
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DELAWARE COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02155
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BANKS v. CAPACCIO et al
as 1:2022cv02154
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
NICK CAPACCIO, JAMES C. DUFF, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
