Cases 31 - 40 of 89
VICTOR v. FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv00286
Defendant:
JANE DOE, COUNSELOR LOU, COMMISSIONER LOHR and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ARNOLD v. G.E.O. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv05407
Defendant:
TAMMY S. FERGUSON, G.E.O. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONS, CHIEF JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE A. ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. DELISMA et al
as 3:2019cv00196
Defendant:
ROXANNE PLAYSO, OFFICER FETTERMAN, BRIAN P. HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nottingham et al v. Harry et al
as 3:2019cv01949
Respondent:
Jeanna Longo, Kenneth Osokow, Anthony Ciuca and others
Petitioner:
James E. Nottingham and William Haight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CONAWAY v. LESKINEN et al
as 2:2018cv01684
Defendant:
JUDGE STEVEN LESKINEN, CAPTAIN DAVID J. RUTTER, LT. THOMAS ROLENCIK and others
Plaintiff:
HERBERT DALE CONAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DILLINGER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv01491
Petitioner:
JOSEPH R. DILLINGER
Respondent:
RICHARD BOWER, ROBERT GILMORE and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOWERS v. FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00254
Petitioner:
MARQUISE J. BOWERS
Respondent:
FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pritchett v. Goldanowski et al
as 3:2017cv02085
Plaintiff:
Leonard Pritchett
Defendant:
John Doe Goldanowski, John Doe Mackelvenski, Eddie Salvette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWER v. CANNON et al
as 1:2017cv10905
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BOWER
Defendant:
CANNON, F. REPICE and C. CORDERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik Bowers v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 17-2850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIK BOWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
