Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Richard Dilauri v. William Mullen, et al
as 11-2847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DILAURI
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN, Sheriff, in official and individual capacities, RAMON RUSTIN, Warden, in official and individual capacities, JANE DOE and others
Rivera v. McVey et al
as 1:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Roberto Rivera
Defendant:
Catherine McVey, Judith Selvey, George Burtner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Mendez v. Ms. Johnson, et al
as 11-1363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN L. MENDEZ
Defendant:
C/O JOHN DOE, I, C/O JOHN DOE, II, INMATES and others
BEASLEY v. THE COUNTY OF YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, et al
as 3:2010cv00267
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD BEASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, 1, JOHN DOE, II, JOHN DOE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUZ-GOMEZ v. UNION COUNTY "JAIL WARDEN" et al
as 2:2010cv05538
Plaintiff:
EMELDO CRUZ-GOMEZ
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY "JAIL WARDEN, R. LONEKER, SPEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMONDS v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2010cv00444
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. HAMMONDS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE II, JOHN DOE III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Merring v. Harris et al
as 1:2010cv00719
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Wayne Merring
Defendant:
Robert Harris, Salamon, Pierre and others
Debtor:
Doe IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS et al v. LOWE'S HOME CENTER, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00366
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. JENKINS and CAROLINE J. BARNES
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTER, INC., JOHN DOE I, CORBIN NEELEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Doe et al
as 1:2009cv00939
Plaintiff:
Kennard Lane
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REIGLE v. REISH et al
as 2:2009cv04016
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JOSEPH REIGLE
Defendant:
RALPH REISH, JIM SMINK, JANE DOE II NURSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
