Cases 31 - 40 of 1,106
Frank Hubbard v. Gary Lanigan, et al
as 23-2359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK HUBBARD
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY LANIGAN, STEVEN JOHNSON and RALPH WOODWARD
Defendant:
MARY LANG
DAVIS v. SCI FOREST
as 2:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
GARY DAVIS
Defendant:
JUDGE DONNA JO MCDANIEL, MAGISTRATE JUDGE KIM HOOTS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHELSIE PRATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Bruce v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 23-2336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES GARY BRUCE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Gary Davis v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 23-2280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
DAVIS v. TICE
as 2:2023cv02617
Plaintiff:
GARY DAVIS
Defendant:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. HENRY et al
as 1:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
GARY DAVIS
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHELLE HENRY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY STEVEN ZAPALLA and SUPERINTENDENT IRWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2023cv03460
Plaintiff:
GARY L. WILSON
Defendant:
EUGENE CALDWELL, II and NURSE ANGIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Trainor v. Wellpath, et al
as 23-1771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, CRNP SUTHERLAND and others
William Plummer v. Wellpath, et al
as 23-1637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM PLUMMER
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. ROBERT MAXA and others
Edward Franchville, Jr. v. Cape May County Correctional Center, et al
as 23-1536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VICTOR FRANCHVILLE, JR.
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, VICTORIA WELLS-MANLANDRO, WARDEN DONALD LOMBARDO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
