Cases 31 - 40 of 189
MORTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv07888
Plaintiff:
TYRON MORTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. MANENTI et al
as 1:2015cv07213
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SCOTT
Defendant:
JOHN MANENTI, JOSEPH NORWOOD, MARK A. KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ORTIZ-CONTRERAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv01889
Plaintiff:
Lucio Ortiz-Contreras
Defendant:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. , Harley Lappin , Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROUDABUSH v. BUMB et al
as 3:2015cv06554
Petitioner:
JAMES ROUDABUSH, JR.
Respondent:
RENEE MARIE BUMB, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C.E. SAMUELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ABRAMOV v. SHARTLE et al
as 1:2015cv06537
Plaintiff:
GIDON ABRAMOV
Defendant:
J.T. SHARTLE, DAVID DEMPSEY, J.L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TURNER v. JANE DOE et al
as 1:2015cv05942
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. TURNER
Defendant:
JANE DOE, J.T. SHARTLE, NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TURNER v. RODGER et al
as 1:2015cv05499
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. TURNER
Defendant:
M. RODGER, J.T. SHARTLE, ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCullon v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2015cv01205
Petitioner:
Michael Tyrone McCullon
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert, David R. Wilson, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NORWOOD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv04149
Petitioner:
MICHAEL NORWOOD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Derrick Brown v. Scott Holtzapple, et al
as 15-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTING WARDEN SCOTT HOLTZAPPLE, ACTING WARDEN J. BUTLER, CAPTAIN B. TAGGERT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
