Cases 31 - 40 of 101
ROSE v. SLAUGHTER et al
as 2:2019cv17378
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JAMES SLAUGHTER
Petitioner:
ANTHONY ROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DUBOISE et al v. WOODS et al
as 1:2019cv00007
Plaintiff:
RYAN DUBOISE and SYHEED WILSON
Defendant:
OFFICER BARGER, OFFICER THORNTON, OFFICER ROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rose v. Monroe County Courthouse et al
as 3:2018cv02396
Defendant:
Sgt Viera, District Attorney E. Davis Christine, Michael Mancuso and others
Plaintiff:
Devine Rose and Steven Love Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE v. CORIZON HEALTH INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04650
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROSE
Defendant:
MS. ROSE and CORIZON HEALTH INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY et al
as 3:2018cv13304
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY
Petitioner:
CLIVE A. ROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weber v. Quinlan et al
as 1:2018cv00637
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Weber
Defendant:
Amy Arnott Quinlan, John Carney, Matt Denn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeFever et al v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv01499
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lefever, Robert Cummings, Daniel Greatwater and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCUSKER v. PERUTO et al
as 2:2017cv02889
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MCCUSKER
Defendant:
A. CHARLES PERUTO, JR., THE LAW OFFICES OF A. CHARLES PERUTO, JR. ESQ, SCOTT SIGMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
SMITH v. CONNOR et al
as 1:2017cv00269
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL CONNOR, ANDREW B. JOHNSON, JOSEPH CORBEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
