Cases 31 - 40 of 181
Michael Kramer v. City of New Kensington, et al
as 15-3455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL KRAMER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON, NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY GRILLO, in their individually and official capacities and others
Weber v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv00506
Petitioner:
Paul E. Weber
Respondent:
David Pierce and Matthew Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAMMONDS v. FOREMAN et al
as 2:2014cv00787
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN HAMMONDS
Defendant:
SAMUEL H. FOREMAN, WEBER, GALLAGHER, SIMPSON, STAPLETON, FIRES & NEWBY, LLP and INGRID LI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBER v. OVERMEYER
as 1:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
CLARK A. WEBER
Defendant:
OVERMEYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Aviles et al
as 2:2013cv06101
Petitioner:
CARLOS MENDEZ
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, Scott A. Weber, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LOPEZ v. AVILES et al
as 2:2013cv03106
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN RAMOS LOPEZ
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KRAMER v. THE CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON et al
as 2:2013cv00606
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KRAMER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON, THE NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPT., ANTHONY GRILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWEN v. AVILES et al
as 2:2013cv01862
Petitioner:
RUPERT BOWEN
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reyes v. Larson et al
as 3:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
Samuel Reyes
Defendant:
James Larson and Sharon Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Phelps et al
as 1:2013cv00283
Petitioner:
Paul Edward Weber
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Beau Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
