Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Brown v. Hannah et al
as 4:2011cv00260
Plaintiff:
Keith Stanley Brown
Defendant:
Sue Hannah , Charles Mitchell and Raymond Lawler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLAIN v. KLOPOTOSKI et al
as 2:2010cv07241
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, MALVIN S. LOCKETT, BRIAN V. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Hannah et al
as 1:2010cv01122
Plaintiff:
Bennie Miller
Defendant:
Hannah, Deputy Royer, Heaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Fisher et al
as 3:2010cv00459
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Hill
Defendant:
J.D. Fisher, Daniel Myers, Patti Stover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Beard et al
as 3:2009cv02234
Plaintiff:
Konata Matthews
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, William Sprenkle, James Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdus Salaam Malik v. Lewis Hannah, et al
as 09-4206
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ABDUS SALAAM MALIK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CAMDEN, individually and as the municipality of the Camden Police Department
Defendant - Appellant:
LEWIS P. HANNAH
HANNAH v. COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND et al
as 1:2009cv05705
Plaintiff:
ALBERT HANNAH, JR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND, CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and OFFICER JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLAIN v. KORMANIC et al
as 2:2009cv00691
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KORMANIC, PAUL K. SMEAL, LISA G. HOLLZBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Beard et al
as 3:2009cv00708
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Thompson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, R.M. Lawler, R.S. Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harper v. Hannah, et al
as 09-1125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
SUE HANNAH, RICHARD NORRIS, MYERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
