Cases 41 - 50 of 83
SANCHEZ v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2013cv00982
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
COLEMAN, HERBIK, BERRIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2013cv01789
Plaintiff:
Dexter Randolph
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Ronnie Holt, Angela P. Dunbar and others
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
CREIGHTON-EL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv00881
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH CREIGHTON-EL
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEROME WALSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wayman v. Phelps
as 1:2013cv00947
Plaintiff:
Randolph E. Wayman
Defendant:
Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Randolph, IV v. John Wetzel, et al
as 13-1961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN WETZEL, Secretary of P.A. D.O., DR. BYANCHUK JIN, DR. HERBICK and others
Randolph Bethune v. Cape May County, et al
as 12-3084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDOLPH BETHUNE
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPE MAY COUNTY, JOHN F. CALLINAN, RICHARD P. HARRON and others
RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv03306
Plaintiff:
SHAFF RANDOLPH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Randolph v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00784
Plaintiff:
Richard Randolph
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RANDOLPH v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY et al
as 1:2011cv04711
Plaintiff:
PATRICK RANDOLPH
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, CHAPLIN MILLER and SGT IRIS QUEZERGUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv03396
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JEFFREY BEARD, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
