Cases 41 - 50 of 153
Parchinski v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2018cv00700
Plaintiff:
Shannon Marie Parchinski
Defendant:
Lackawanna County , Vincent Mooney , Robert McMillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMARR v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv01637
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH SMARR
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY, WEXFORD HEALTH RESOURCES, INC, JOHN R. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roderick Black v. Warden Fairton FCI
as 17-3687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FAIRTON FCI
BLACK v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI GREENE et al
as 1:2017cv00305
Petitioner:
SCOTT A. BLACK
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI GREENE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FOREST COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADKINS v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv07727
Plaintiff:
MARK MATTHEW ADKINS
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC, ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, ROBIN CLEMONS, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Black v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 17-3060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
DOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Dominic Black v. Pennsylvania Board of Probatio, et al
as 17-2511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMINIC BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, LISA MOSER, KIMBERLEY A. BARKLEY and others
Roderick Black v. Warden Fairton FCI
as 17-1356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FAIRTON FCI
DALES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00743
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DALES
Defendant:
MAY, BLACK, CORIZON MEDICAL TEAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACK v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2016cv09171
Petitioner:
JONATHAN BLACK
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
