Cases 41 - 50 of 80
GOMEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00219
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
AXEL GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GOMEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv05678
Petitioner:
ELI GOMEZ
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ESTELA-GOMEZ et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2015cv06778
Plaintiff:
LUIS FERNANDO ESTELA-GOMEZ, HUGHES ALEXANDER, ORLANDINO DASILVA and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Larry Serrano-Gomez v. Houtzdale SCI
as 15-2448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY SERRANO-GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
HOUTZDALE SCI
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 15-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
SERRANO-GOMEZ v. STUBBCE
as 3:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
Larry Serrano-Gomez
Defendant:
Stubbce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SERRANO-GOMEZ v. HOUTZDALE CORRECTION FACILITY
as 3:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
LARRY SERRANO-GOMEZ
Defendant:
HOUTZDALE CORRECTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SERRANO-GOMEZ v. COMMUNDWHELTH OF LANCASTER PA et al
as 5:2014cv07391
Plaintiff:
LARRY SERRANO-GOMEZ
Defendant:
COMMUNDWHELTH OF LANCASTER PA, NUESTRA CLINICA RESIDENCIAL AT LANC. PA, STUBBCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SERRANO-GOMEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2014cv07390
Petitioner:
LARRY SERRANO-GOMEZ
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAN. CRAIG W. STEDMAN, ESQ. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LAN. JAMES J. KARL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SERRANO-GOMEZ v. HOUTZDALE CORRECTION FACELITY
as 2:2014cv06910
Plaintiff:
LARRY SERRANO-GOMEZ
Defendant:
HOUTZDALE CORRECTION FACELITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
