Cases 41 - 50 of 97
CANO v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2020cv11870
Respondent:
CHAD F. WOLF, GUY CIRILLO, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON and others
Petitioner:
MAGDIEL ALEXANDER MORAD CANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VIRHAL v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2020cv11734
Respondent:
CHAD F. WOLF, GUY CIRILLO, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON and others
Petitioner:
GUILHERME BONTEMPO VIRHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. MEUNER et al
as 1:2020cv06982
Defendant:
HAMILTON TOWNSHIP POLICE OFFICERS and DAVID MEUNER
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL AARON GUY HOWZE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUIJANO et al v. BERKS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2020cv01362
Petitioner:
LUZ E QUIJANO, JESUS M CRESPO, LUIS ENRIQUE MORALES and others
Respondent:
READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, DALE R. TRYTHALL, JR., LARRY SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPNEY v. ANDERSON et al
as 2:2020cv02476
Respondent:
WILLIAM ANDERSON, ALFARO ORTIZ and GUY CIRILLO
Petitioner:
STANLEY S. STEPNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BURMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR et al
as 3:2019cv00123
Plaintiff:
ALLAH BURMAN
Defendant:
KOPERA MEDICAL STAFF, ERIC BRADLEY, IAN CONNORS and others
Petitioner:
DONALD N. DAVEY and TIMICO C. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Swartz et al
as 1:2019cv00762
Defendant:
Guy Dumas, CO's Jane/John Does, Sgt. Swartz and others
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Clark, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv00976
Petitioner:
KEVIN GUY
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2017cv05201
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WHITE
Defendant:
JIM KENNEY, MICHAEL NUTTER, MICHAEL RESNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NANCE v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2017cv00672
Plaintiff:
LYLE D. NANCE
Defendant:
PATRICK NOGAN, GARY LANIGAN, GUY CIRILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
