Cases 41 - 50 of 65
William Victor, et al v. R. Lawler, et al
as 11-2750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Defendant - Appellee:
R. M. LAWLER, M. W. HARLOW, DORINA VARNER and others
Timothy Hatten v. D. Young, et al
as 11-2043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HATTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
D YOUNG, W. ZEGARSKI, J. ADIMI and others
HARMON v. LAMAR et al
as 2:2011cv00679
Petitioner:
WESLEY HARMON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAR , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatten v. Young et al
as 1:2010cv02660
Defendant:
D. Young, W. Zegarski, J. Adimi and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vincent Glazewski v. Gov. John Corzine, et al
as 10-1371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT GLAZEWSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN LA PENTA, STATE INVESTIGATOR PRISON COMPLAINTS, JOSEPH BUCHHOLTZ, KAREN MCBRIART and others
WILLIAMS v. THE STATE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2010cv00019
Defendant:
THE STATE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, JEFFREY BEARD, MARILYN BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Aleem-x v. White et al
as 1:2010cv00038
Plaintiff:
Siddiq A. Aleem-x
Defendant:
Shane White, Elizabeth Hopkins, Carmen Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Danberg et al
as 1:2009cv00956
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Brown
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Christopher Senato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Harmon v. Supt Nish, et al
as 09-3990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY HARMON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPT NISH, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
POTTER v. GLOVER et al
as 2:2009cv04304
Plaintiff:
ERIC POTTER
Defendant:
JAMES GLOVER, ERIC STOKES, JOHN DOE HARMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
