Cases 41 - 50 of 108
BANKS v ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00620
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00604
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RUIZ-ACOSTA v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORT DIX
as 1:2017cv03675
Plaintiff:
SANTOS RUIZ-ACOSTA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv02924
Plaintiff:
ALAN D. GARRETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, JEROME B. SIMANDLE, MAGGIE F. MOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUPONT v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2016cv07846
Plaintiff:
VERCY DUPONT, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANSELL v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2016cv03421
Petitioner:
TYREE MANSELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Malone v. United States District Court
as 4:2016cv01231
Petitioner:
Ricky Ricardo Malone
Respondent:
United States District Court, .
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CAMDEN NEW JERSEY
as 1:2016cv02242
Petitioner:
STEPHEN THOMAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CAMDEN NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Johnson v. Allegheny County Court of Comm, et al
as 15-4002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
