Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Michael Forrest v. Michael Overmyer, et al
as 15-2613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant:
MD ABRAHAM, MD AMANDA, MD JEFFREY BEARD and others
Forrest v. Overmeyer et al
as 3:2014cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Forrest
Defendant:
Michael Overmeyer, Michael Tice, Lt. Murin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2014cv00108
Plaintiff:
LORENZO SIMS
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, CORIZON INC., NANCY FLYNN MCGARVIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, ERIC TICE, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, MICHEAL OVERMYER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, MICHEAL OVERMYER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Miguel Molina v. Nancy McGarvie, et al
as 13-4302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL MOLINA
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY MCGARVIE, KIM SMITH and BEVERLY O'ROURKE
BREELAND v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BREELAND
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, NANCY MCGARVIE, RHONDA SHERBINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TINDELL v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2013cv00182
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE TINDELL
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , JAMES BARNAGEL , DANIEL BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOLINA v. MCGARVIE et al
as 1:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL MOLINA
Defendant:
NANCY MCGARVIE, KIM SMITH and BEVERLY O'ROURKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
