Cases 51 - 60 of 70
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
ROSHA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JONATHAN NOLAN, RYAN VICTORY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
FLOWE v. GAGNON et al
as 1:2009cv00317
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DAVID FLOWE
Respondent:
GAGNON, MURPHY, NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MURRAY v. GAGNON et al
as 1:2009cv00286
Petitioner:
ERIC MURRAY
Respondent:
GAGNON, ANY ACTING/INTERIM WARDEN @ FCI MCKEAN and NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nolan v. S.C.I. Coal Township et al
as 1:2009cv01823
Petitioner:
Daniel Nolan
Respondent:
S.C.I. Coal Township and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (Brian Hardy)
as 1:2009cv03739
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HARDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. NOLAN et al
as 1:2009cv02672
Plaintiff:
PONTELL BRYANT
Defendant:
NOLAN, DACY, LIVINGSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TINLENBERG v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2008cv01385
Plaintiff:
JASON LOUIS TINLENBERG
Defendant:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, FRANCISO QUINTANA, S. L. NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HUGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2008cv04477
Plaintiff:
NOLAN HUGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Robert Derrickson v. Paula Nolan, et al
as 08-3324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT P. DERRICKSON
Defendant:
PAULA L. NOLAN, MARY NOLAN, DENNIS DURKA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
