Cases 51 - 60 of 206
GRENKE v. HOWSARE et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
SHAWN GRENKE
Defendant:
ERIN HOWSARE, DENNIS VOUGHT, VARSHA PANDYA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCCAULLEY v. CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON et al
as 3:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
DAVID MCCAULLEY
Defendant:
CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON and PRIME CARE MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Krause v. Prime Care Medical
as 1:2021cv01182
Plaintiff:
Mark Krause
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOLLIDAY v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 5:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOLLIDAY
Defendant:
NURSE LEONA, DR KENNETH WLOCHESKI and PRIME CARE MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURDLE v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2021cv00172
Defendant:
DR. MOLLY LONGACHER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, KYLE RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
RAMELL S. HURDLE and RAMELL SCOTT HURDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fantazier v. Lebanon County Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2020cv02199
Defendant:
Lebanon County Correctional Facility, Laura Moyers and Prime Care Medical, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Fantazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2020cv04962
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER MARK JORDAN, LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BULGER v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 5:2020cv04830
Defendant:
JUSTINE CLEMONS, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., JENNIFER KELLY and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LUKE BULGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
