Cases 51 - 60 of 4,992
Nobblen v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
William Nobblen
Defendant:
Laure Harry, Kathy Brittain, County of Philadelphia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALLE v. PARKER et al
as 2:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HALLE
Respondent:
JUSTIN PARKER, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, BEAU SNEDDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Wright, Jr. v. Allen, et al
as 24-1560
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR.
Defendant:
CMC ALLEN, COUNSELOR EZZOLO and CASE MANAGER GABRIEL
BEY v. FULLERTON et al
as 2:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
ZAMA ELOAH BEY and Candace Rae Winstead
Respondent:
WILLIAM FULLERTON, PUBLIC SERVANT SCHULUCK, SARGEANT FORSYTHE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITEHEAD v. TICE et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, Corrections Officer Machesky, CAPRIOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
WHITEHEAD v. TICE et al
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, Corrections Officer Machesky, CAPRIOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITEHEAD v. TICE et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
ERIC TICE, C/O MACHESKY, MR. CAPRIOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
William Neal v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1628
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NEAL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
CLARK v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04641
Petitioner:
WILLIAM CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
