Cases 61 - 70 of 115
TORRES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv03733
Plaintiff:
LUIS ANTONIO TORRES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MIKE NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03420
Petitioner:
FRED PORTER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRESSLEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv03252
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. PRESSLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER et al v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2013cv03642
Plaintiff:
KEITH M. PORTER and RAYMOND E. SALLY
Defendant:
PAUL LAGANA, CINDY SWEENEY, CHANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Dickens v. Taylor, et al
as 13-2533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. DICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STAN TAYLOR, RICHARD E. SEIFERT, ANTHONY RENDINA and others
SALLY et al v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2013cv02558
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND E. SALLY, KEITH M. PORTER, JOSE VILLAFANE and others
Defendant:
PAUL LAGANA and CINDY SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARLEY v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR FARLEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, EVERETT GILLISON, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEADOWS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. MEADOWS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, CORIZON HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDEN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
DARYL HARDEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, EVERETT GILLISON, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Porter v. Dean Dooley, et al
as 12-4322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH M. PORTER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEAN DOOLEY, FRANKLY PARREDES and HEIDI CLAYTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
